<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter &amp; the History of Poetic Utility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timothy-green.org/blog/2009/11/twitter-the-history-of-poetic-utility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timothy-green.org/blog/2009/11/twitter-the-history-of-poetic-utility/</link>
	<description>Poetry Editor and Struggling Poet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:27:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitterpation Nation &#171; Slush Pile</title>
		<link>http://www.timothy-green.org/blog/2009/11/twitter-the-history-of-poetic-utility/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitterpation Nation &#171; Slush Pile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothy-green.org/blog/?p=1096#comment-796</guid>
		<description>[...] just because there’s not much management involved.” (For further reading, see Green’s blogs onTwitter, and on the democratization of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just because there’s not much management involved.” (For further reading, see Green’s blogs onTwitter, and on the democratization of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timothy-green.org/blog/2009/11/twitter-the-history-of-poetic-utility/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothy-green.org/blog/?p=1096#comment-795</guid>
		<description>Yeah, we noticed that, too, but it&#039;s just the way that it worked out.  Maybe deep down in the subconscious it seems like longer poems are more deserving, more substantiative, but it wasn&#039;t intentional, and I actually looked back amongst the better poems to see if there was something shorter that I missed. But that&#039;s just the way things broke...maybe it had as much to do with the good writers thinking longer poems had a better shot, too.  Always hard to tell if it&#039;s the chicken or the egg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, we noticed that, too, but it&#8217;s just the way that it worked out.  Maybe deep down in the subconscious it seems like longer poems are more deserving, more substantiative, but it wasn&#8217;t intentional, and I actually looked back amongst the better poems to see if there was something shorter that I missed. But that&#8217;s just the way things broke&#8230;maybe it had as much to do with the good writers thinking longer poems had a better shot, too.  Always hard to tell if it&#8217;s the chicken or the egg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mather Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.timothy-green.org/blog/2009/11/twitter-the-history-of-poetic-utility/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Mather Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothy-green.org/blog/?p=1096#comment-794</guid>
		<description>I thought this year&#039;s winner was filled with honesty and emotion and reality, whereas last year&#039;s was filled with nothing but stock imagery.  I wish she could have ended it without bringing in greek mythology, but...

I also noticed that all the honorable mentions were pretty long poems.

I like the Hicock poem, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this year&#8217;s winner was filled with honesty and emotion and reality, whereas last year&#8217;s was filled with nothing but stock imagery.  I wish she could have ended it without bringing in greek mythology, but&#8230;</p>
<p>I also noticed that all the honorable mentions were pretty long poems.</p>
<p>I like the Hicock poem, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timothy-green.org/blog/2009/11/twitter-the-history-of-poetic-utility/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothy-green.org/blog/?p=1096#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Joanne and Angie, how do you know you&#039;re not 2 and 3?? :)

Poetry adapts to new mediums well, as it did to the printing press -- part of what cloaks the original purpose of poetry is that it&#039;s adapted so well to the page. If I did more events, I&#039;d want Rattle to have a YouTube channel, but since we only do two a year it hasn&#039;t really been worth the effort.  Poetry.la is awesome, though.

Mather, feel free to say what you really think about anything, just don&#039;t use personal insults and you&#039;ll be fine.  Glad you like the winner better...this years reminds me most of the first winner, actually, Sophia Rivkin&#039;s &quot;Conspiracy.&quot; Same kind of energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joanne and Angie, how do you know you&#8217;re not 2 and 3?? <img src='http://www.timothy-green.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Poetry adapts to new mediums well, as it did to the printing press &#8212; part of what cloaks the original purpose of poetry is that it&#8217;s adapted so well to the page. If I did more events, I&#8217;d want Rattle to have a YouTube channel, but since we only do two a year it hasn&#8217;t really been worth the effort.  Poetry.la is awesome, though.</p>
<p>Mather, feel free to say what you really think about anything, just don&#8217;t use personal insults and you&#8217;ll be fine.  Glad you like the winner better&#8230;this years reminds me most of the first winner, actually, Sophia Rivkin&#8217;s &#8220;Conspiracy.&#8221; Same kind of energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mather Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.timothy-green.org/blog/2009/11/twitter-the-history-of-poetic-utility/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Mather Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothy-green.org/blog/?p=1096#comment-792</guid>
		<description>I got the latest copy of Rattle.  Two copies is nice.  I think the prize winner this year is light years better than last year&#039;s.  Cover art, so so.  (I am trying to be civil.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the latest copy of Rattle.  Two copies is nice.  I think the prize winner this year is light years better than last year&#8217;s.  Cover art, so so.  (I am trying to be civil.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
